Change is afoot at Snobsville Common. I spotted a large, official looking laminated sign prominently displayed in the car park this morning. As it looked important, I took a quick look see to find out what it was all about.
It seems that the council have decided to institute a by law prohibiting one person from walking more than four dogs at one time. This clearly is a measure to prohibit the vast numbers of dog walking companies who use the common – and as my previous entries have mentioned, are often a real nuisance.
I have mixed views about the whole professional dog walking business. On one hand, my own experience of using the lovely Laura in the shire was really good. Mrs Bitey loved her and they had great times together. However, I think the reason why Laura is so brilliant is because she clearly adores dogs and has very clear boundaries of taking small numbers of our canine friends and making sure that they have a wonderful time. She runs her own business and has a very clear aim to focus on a personal service which has quality at its heart- as she does not compromise on this ideal, she sometimes turns away work as a result. That is something that I really respect.
On the other hand, especially up here in Snobsville, we have the larger companies who have identified dog walking as being a particularly rich cash cow to milk. These companies seem to provide a dull, soulless experience with no real personal care or interest. They take too many dogs and are unable to maintain control. They have no sense of community duty or spirit other than to pick up the odd bit of dog poo. The dogs are herded in a pack and there is little energy or affection. Most of the time the dogs are left to their own devices while the walkers sit around with takeaway coffees having a fag.
Only this week I watched a dog walker with too many charges and not enough time park up to offload some of them for a run. The result was 6 small and boisterous dogs running around her and another 3 panting and whining with anticipation sat in the van. She darted from dog to dog bagging up poo and did not get beyond the car park.
I think she was planning to load them all back into the van and let the other 3 out (it was early in the day and nobody bar me and Mrs B were about). I was sitting on a gravestone waiting patiently for my intrepid squirrel hunter to return silently watching and thinking that owners were paying at least £20 per dog for this ‘service’. Just as she started to lift the first dog back into the van, Mrs B appeared wagging and flushed with the joys of hunting and the startled walker heard my voice and spotted me getting up from my perch with Mrs B in tow. The dog who was in the process of being loaded into the van was hastily deposited back onto the floor and the walker rounded up the pack and scuttled off looking sheepish. The 3 other dogs remained in the van, and were by now barking furiously with frustration.
So any measures that curb this kind of exploitation of animals and the faith of their owners can only be a good thing. However, there are some owners who come to the common who actually own more than 4 dogs- so what happens to them?
Julie and Ron live near to me and have a rag, tag and bobtail collection of little dogs of all ages. They foster rescue dogs as well as having their own pets and in all there are usually about 6 of them. Both Julie and Ron have a ‘past’ and a reputation locally for various dodgy pursuits but since I’ve had Mrs B I’ve got to know them and they are very friendly and caring, particularly in relation to all things of a doggy nature. They visit the common about 4 times a day taking it in turns and are held in very high regard by all of the locals who use the common. Old Aristo can often be seen in animated chatter with them, striding along bellowing about beasts and cadging a sneaky fag from Julie. Their dogs are lovely, far better behaved than Mrs B and whether its Julie or Ron in charge, they keep a watchful eye on their pack.
Another couple who have less of a past and more of a heritage like Old Aristo also foster dogs and have a large gaggle bouncing around them. Old Aristo, who is very scornful of dog walking companies, was at great pains to tell me that the barbour toting rust coloured corduroy trousered couple were *not* to be mistaken for ‘these dreadful company people’. The Cords are the polar class opposite of Ron and Julie and yet all are united by the love of their animals and can often all be seen trotting along together. Given the strict divisions in the dog park, it is really rather heartwarming to see this.
Worryingly this may all come to an end though as the by law does not specify dog walking companies or individuals being paid to walk dogs. It simply says no more than 4 dogs at one time. Excluding and prosecuting the likes of Ron, Julie and the Cords will serve no purpose and the walking companies will simply go elsewhere. Dogs of course have no way of telling us what is going on and so some of these companies have a perfect opportunity to mistreat and shortchange both dogs and owners.
So what is the solution? To me, proper licensing and registration is the way forward. We would not leave our children with an unregulated and unknown person so why is it ok to do this with our dogs?